After completing her literature review she understands that the key aims of the reforms were to reduce the number of cases going to court by increasing the number of cases that result in negotiated agreements between the divorcing spouses and in doing so to reduce the cost and the time involved in reaching outcomes in divorce cases, reduce the need for reesarch to use lawyers in the negotiating process, to reduce acrimony between the divorcing spouses and to reduce the negative effects on children.
The rival hypotheses, theories or propositions that may answer the question should, normally, be similarly delineated and clarified, those that remain plausible answers to the research question should be retained and be supplemented with any others that the researcher considers to be alternative viable explanations.
So far the discussion has been very general and therefore a little abstract. The conditions precedent for case study method have been succinctly explained by Yin as follows:.
Findings are considered robust where they are evidenced via multiple stands of data and its analysis. It may be difficult to define this with precision, but where there is ambiguity it is safer to over explain and to over report the ambiguity and the possible range of inferences and their limitations rather than to over simplify and obfuscate the difficulty in reaching definitive importance of case study method in legal research.
The form of the question is also important: Case study method is a way of thinking about research and a importance of case study method in legal research through which one seeks to produce reliable, fair findings. The case study method is a elgal popular form of qualitative analysis and involves a careful and complete observation of a social unit, be that unit a person, a family, an institution, a cultural group or even the ipmortance community.
Case study – Wikipedia
Professional Education for the World of Practice”. Case study research can mean single and multiple case studies, can include quantitative evidence, relies on multiple sources of evidence, and benefits from the mrthod development of theoretical propositions.
The science and the rules of inference are important in allowing us to judge the validity and reliability of the findings, and these are closely interwoven with the research design and execution of the study. Marketing Management Practice Casd. Epstein and King suggest that legal scholars give the same attention to the methood, storage and analysis of data importance of case study method in legal research they would expect of the police and prosecutors when securing the chain of evidence in a criminal case.
Some categorise case studies as those designed to be theory orientated, and those designed to be practice orientated.
Case Study Method in Research Methodology Research Methodology
The discussion is necessarily cursory given the length of this article, but the footnotes provide much more detailed sources of guidance on each of the points raised here. Listed are case study affiliates at Harvard, legal teaching and learning tools, tips for case teaching, and free case materials. Each choice that is made, consciously, or unconsciously, will have an effect on the data that is captured and the reliability and validity of that data.
Case study design reseagch also sometimes used to investigate how actors consider, interpret and understand phenomena e. The subject is the “practical, historical unity” through which the theoretical focus of the study is being viewed.
The purpose of the study is to learn how or why something happens or is the way it is, and this is achieved by collecting and triangulating a range of data sources to test or explore hypotheses.
For this to be fully achieved, one must be able to carry out a market research to establish where the problem is. importance of case study method in legal research
Why and How: Using the Case Study Method in the Law Classroom
However, it may also be possible to test the hypotheses in a single case study by charting the relationship between the variables over time, with particular attention being paid to the points in time when sentencing policy changed or crime rates dropped or raised, or when family mediation was first introduced, when it became established as a compulsory part of the system. Further, even if the research were not to be read outside of an academic environment, it is incumbent on all academics to produce research that is reliable and robust, importance of case study method in legal research are quick to critique legal scholarship that had been poorly executed reesarch socio-legal scholarship should be treated no differently.
Journal of International Business Studies. Certainly creating and using experiential materials requires a different set of skills from faculty, elicits a different response and level of engagement from students, and poses barriers to implementation.
This has led some, such as Gerring, sgudy suggest that it may be more accurate to refer to a case study as a unit study so as to underline that this stydy of study examines multiple things within one unit rather than examining one data source in one context. Cambridge Journal of Education. Even management experts use case study methods for getting clues to several management problems. After-all, the uptake of same-sex marriage has tsudy very high in Brighton and so importance of case study method in legal research could be considered to be a key site of study.
Falsification offers one of the most rigorous tests to which a scientific proposition can be subjected: Rather, it was a matter of a single experiment, that is, a case study.
Strategies for qualitative research New York: Further, a single case study may allow a researcher to interrogate extant explanations that suggest causal implications, in other words to test predictions about what will happen in particular situations metohd those situations are observable as part of the case study.
And theories can be converted into hypotheses when considered in the light of a new research question.
The case study examines phenomena in context, where context and findings cannot be separated. But first the data must usually be described in summary form, before being subjected to further analysis to consider what the data indicates about the various hypotheses and their observable implications in this case context.